Submission Flow

Ethical Approval Submission Flow of the Research Ethics Committee

Applications undergo Administrative Review, Substantive Review, and a final decision. Applications requiring changes return to the relevant review stage.

Normal processing time (if complete) Maximum 44 Working Days (14 Administrative Review + 30 Substantive Review)
Additional time (if incomplete) Maximum 5 Working Days

Durations are calculated on working days according to the operating hours of the UPI Research Ethics Committee service. Time used by the applicant to complete or revise documents is not included in the review duration.

1

Online Researcher Registration

The researcher creates an account, completes the form, and submits the required application documents online.

2

Administrative Review

The completeness of the documents and administrative requirements is assessed before the ethics review proceeds.

Maximum 14 Working Days
Are the documents and administrative requirements complete?
No

Incomplete Documents

The application is returned to the researcher for completion before the review can continue.

Maximum 5 Working Days Return to Administrative Review
Yes

Chair of the UPI Research Ethics Committee

The Chair of the UPI Research Ethics Committee assigns the appropriate review path based on the nature and risk of the research.

Which ethics review pathway applies?
Exempted

Ethical Exemption

The committee determines that the research meets the exemption criteria under the applicable guidelines.

Expedited

Ethics Reviewer

A designated reviewer conducts the substantive review for research that meets the expedited review criteria.

Maximum 30 Working Days
Full Board

Plenary / Full Board Meeting

Applications requiring broader consideration are discussed by the full committee according to their risk and review needs.

Maximum 30 Working Days

An expedited application that cannot be approved by the reviewer is referred to the full board for a decision.

What is the ethics review decision?
Revision

Revision by Researcher

The researcher completes or revises the documents in response to the review comments.

Reviewed again through the applicable pathway
Approved

Ethical Approval

The application is determined to meet the applicable ethical requirements.

Rejected

Rejected

The application cannot proceed based on the committee's review.